Exponential View

Exponential View

Share this post

Exponential View
Exponential View
💡 On forecasts & prediction error
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More

💡 On forecasts & prediction error

Mobile data stats dive

Azeem Azhar
Feb 11, 2021
∙ Paid
30

Share this post

Exponential View
Exponential View
💡 On forecasts & prediction error
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
2
Share

One of my favourite annuals is the Ericsson Mobility Report. The telecoms infrastructure firm has been producing this report since 2011. The earliest version I could find online was the 2014 report1, so I snuck back and compared their predictions for 20202 to reality.

In short, Ericsson did pretty well…. except where they didn’t.

The table shows their 2020 predictions from 2014 compared to 2020’s actual data. If they were within 30% of their forecast, I’ve scored them as “accurate”. Worse than that as inaccurate. The green prediction errors are where they overestimated the change, the red is where the underestimated.

If you look at the forecasts, there seems to be a single dominant source of error: the impact of the smartphone. Start with subscriptions. Ericsson wildly overestimated the growth of mobile subscriptions, reckoning that by 2020, the average human would have 1.25 mobile phone subscriptions, and more than one mobile broadband subscription.

The firm was cruise-missile accurate w…

This post is for paid subscribers

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 EPIIPLUS1 Ltd
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share

Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More