Exponential View

Exponential View

šŸ”® The curious economics of a $6 AI agent #597

Amazon spent some $1.8 million on a Claude project that ran unnoticed for five months. ā€œIt’s difficult to figure out how much anything [AI-related] costsā€.

Azeem Azhar and Marija Gavrilov
Aug 16, 2026
āˆ™ Paid

Good morning from London.

We are looking for an outstanding economist to join us as an AI Economy Research Fellow. If you know someone we should speak to, send them our way.

Cheers

A MESSAGE FROM OUR SPONSOR

This paid post was unlocked for you by Granola, the AI notepad for back-to-back meetings.

Granola is our team’s favorite note-taker. We’re excited to partner with Granola to bring four months of free access to the Business plan (10 seats) to Exponential View annual members. This perk, valued at $560, is now part of our membership.

Upgrade to claim your free access to Granola.

Claim the perk

The AI spend of your nightmares

Amazon spent some $1.8 million on a Claude project that ran for five months. A senior employee said: ā€œIt’s difficult to figure out how much anything [AI-related] costsā€.

We had a similar experience with R Mini Arnold, my OpenClaw agent. Its costs have run up as it has grown in complexity, and it takes time to switch it to progressively cheaper models. It becomes hard to keep track of exactly what is running efficiently and what isn’t. Nathan Warren called out an outrageous few days when the bot blew through $500 a day.

The subsequent tedious audit was worth it. Many processes were running older, higher-tier models, like Opus 4.5, which are more expensive than smaller, newer models like Sonnet 5 or a slew of open-weight models. The price war that has broken out between Anthropic and OpenAI in r…

User's avatar

Continue reading this post for free, courtesy of Azeem Azhar.

Or purchase a paid subscription.
Ā© 2026 EPIIPLUS1 Ltd Ā· Privacy āˆ™ Terms āˆ™ Collection notice
Start your SubstackGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture