š® AI & climate change; blockchain and the internet; medicine meets AI; Alexa's growth, Apple's error; cheese, MOOCs, rotary phones++ #200
I received a huge dose of optimism this week when I was in Dublin
Exponential View
Azeem Azharās Weekly Wondermissive: Future, Tech & SocietyĀ
This issue has been supported by Hanover CommunicationsĀ Ā
Hanover prepares brands for the age of AI
Read their report on the reputational challenges that come with the AI revolution
Dept of podcastsĀ š§
TheĀ Exponential ViewĀ podcast is supported by Spotify.
The podcast resumes next week after a short break.
If you havenāt listened to the series, find it wherever you listen to your podcasts. And if you have, please help me spread the word by leaving a review or rating. It really helps!
Exponential View is available on: Spotify (recommended) |Ā iTunes | Stitcher |Ā Soundcloud |Ā Overcast |Ā Breaker
Dept of the near future
š® Gradually, then suddenly. Tim O'Reilly on the āsmall changes which accumulate, and suddenly the world is a different placeā, including his insights on ubiquitous AI; the decline of the US; the future of food; genetic engineering, and more.
šÆ Chris Dixon on how the blockchain could allow us to build internet services that encapsulate the original intention community-led ethos of the internet. It is an appealing theory: combining the bottom-up, non-hierarchical nature of open-source with a mathematically-rigorous implementation of computational trust. (Two EV subscribers, Kevin Werbach and Kenn Cukier, discuss the blockchain, its trust and governance mechanics. Also, McKinsey & Co on blockchainās Occam problem: the finance industry is cooling on it as little of substance was being delivered. Azeemās comment: seems like a problem of exuberance before product-market fit. There is a high likelihood as Werbach, Dixon & I argue that blockchain is going to be a powerful, foundational technology. But technologies need time to mature and evolve, and generally one wants to find where the smartest developers are and how practitioners are evolving applications on a core technology like this. And generally, donāt follow the big dollars, shiny PowerPoint & crisp suits.)
š What AI will mean for climate change. Itās complicated, argues David Victor. On the one hand, oil and gas firms are well positioned to use new analytical techniques to increase efficiency and get those wells flowing. But there are also transformative ways AI could help: by helping us focus adaptation strategies; by democratising & evolving effective local responses more rapidly; by differentially helping poorer communities to respond to the ravages of climate change. (Azeemās comment: As a general purpose technology, AI could also reduce the cost of basic goods, through optimisations and efficiencies, a change that should benefit the poor more than the rich. I also reckon we can be hopeful that applying AI in biology, biochemistry and core scientific domains could help with specific technical developments that might mitigate or help adapt to the impact of climate change. See also, the mounting challenges for the insurance industry in dealing with climate change. Urban flood damage alone is forecast to jump 20-fold to about $1 trillion a year by 2050.)
šæ Ocasio-Cortez vs Trump. Kara Swisher on the new tempo of politics and why the US President may have met his matchāat least on social media.
šø Venture capital is on fire. Nearly $100bn of deals in 2018, the highest level since 1999, even though the total number of deals declined. This is because of more megadeals. Seed funding actually declined as well. (See also: more startups pass on venture capital "jet fuel", and new types of capital are starting to emerge. Gerry Neumann explains the maths of venture capital and why VCs need to take high risks, with limited room for medium risk investing. Azeemās comment: There are many sources of capital, with different risk appetites and different expectations. Choose wisely! Don't fuel your jet with forecourt diesel. And don't put rocket fuel into your moped.)
Dept of internet business
C-r-a-z-y. There are more than 100m Alexa-enabled devices worldwide, including about 150 that are not made by Amazon. The device had a bumper Christmas shopping season. I remember reading forecasts for voice devices back in 2016 which headily suggested a global installed base of 5-6m by 2018. And here we are with more than 20 times more than that. Of course, Apple via Siri, Google through Google Assistant and even Microsoft's Cortana have much larger user base that Alexa. (Siri and Google Assistant approach or exceed a billion; Microsoft announced monthly 150m users for Cortana last summer.)
And with those numbers come more predictions that 2019 will be the year voice commerce takes off. My prediction: it wonāt, if I am bullish in the long term for voice as an interface. I don't believe we have adequately solved the user experience or the core natural language understanding techniques to really delight. Amazon trumpeted several Alexa use cases that were growing in this blog post, but ultimately music, timers and smart home integrations seem to be the dominant apps. Is it enough?
šŗ Netflix and chill no more. As the technology commoditises, more studios are yanking content from Netflix and preparing to launch their own streaming services.
š¤ Americans over 65 are seven times more likely to share fake news on Facebook than the 18 to 29-year-olds.
Amazon's Ring subsidiary allowed large numbers of contractors in Ukraine unimpeded access to customer videos.
Ofo, the over-expansive bike-sharing business is teetering on the brink. (It was rumoured to be burning $25m per month.)
Apple is Unitedās biggest corporate customer globally, spending $35m a year on flights to Shanghai from SF alone (50 daily business class seats).
Apple's new phone will have three rear cameras.
š„ Ben Thompson on Apple's errors.
Dept of AI & data
Eric Topolās comprehensive survey on the convergence of AI and human doctors on the path to high-performance medicine. Long, deeply footnoted, and worth reading over two cups of coffee.
Topol argues
almost every type of clinician [...] will be using AI technology, and in particular deep learning, in the future
He reviews applications in radiology, dermatology, ophthalmology, mental health, health systems, patient experience and more.
One useful framing is his analogy between self-driving cars and medical applications. Topol reckons a level three equivalence (conditional automation, reliant on human experts as backup) is the likely object for medical AI, and not human-free level five autonomous vehicle makers are striving for.
This is a healthy dose of sobriety for outlandish technical claims about āreplacing doctorsā rather than augmenting health systems and improving outcomes.
And he cautions:
The field is certainly high on promise and relatively low on data and proof. The risk of faulty algorithms is exponentially higher than that of a single doctorāpatient interaction, yet the reward for reducing errors, inefficiencies, and cost is substantial. Accordingly, there cannot be exceptionalism for AI in medicineāit requires rigorous studies.
One key requirement for AI diagnostics will be explainability. Here is a profile of Been Kim, a Google researcher, working on building interpretability for famously indecipherable machine learning systems. Recommended read.
After raising $1.2bn last year, Sensetime, the world's most well-funded AI startup, is after another $2bn. One of its products is Viper which will āprocess and analyse over 100,000 simultaneous real-time streams from traffic cameras, ATMs, and more to automatically tag and keep track of individuals.ā
š The US Census Department intends to use differential privacy to manage the 2020 Census. This should allow the dataset to be shared without compromising individual user privacy.
Reconciling deep learning with symbolic artificial intelligence: a handy survey of approaches that bridge symbolic and sub-symbolic approaches to AI.
Short morsels to appear smart at dinner parties
š§ Henry Marsh, a neurosurgeon, writes a beautiful essay challenging the notion that we can build a brain: āeven if it is possible, it is still a very long way away.ā The brain has 86 billion neurons and an estimated 150 trillion connections. We know much more than that but, not yet, enough to really engineer a brain.
š The lifetime carbon load of an electric vehicle is about a third of that of a diesel or petrol equivalent says Auke Hoestra, my go-to-analyst on these topics.
Carmakers globally are pouring $300bn into electric vehicles, around 45% of it in China.
Massive online courses, or MOOCs, have terrible completion rates. Fewer than 12% of students return for a second year. āThe 6-year saga of MOOCs provides a cautionary tale for education policymakers facing whatever will be the next promoted innovation in education technology.ā
š Improving the bus connection from the city centre to the outskirts, the fastest growing city in Africa cut commutes from 2hrs to 45m.
Earth's magnetic field is shifting faster than previously predicted.
š§ Glorious cheese. The US cheese surplus is getting larger. š§
How bounty hunters can track down your phone for a few bucks. Fascinating. h/t @chriswigley
š Watch two teenagers try to use a rotary phone.
š½ Could the mysterious object Oumuamua be an alien spaceship?
End note
I received an unsafe dose of optimism this week when I was in Dublin (the exponential city... itās always doublinā). I was giving a talk and had a chance to mosey into the BT Young Scientist competition, and was treated to a remarkable, uplifting experience.
In its sixth decade, the competition attracts teenagers from all over Ireland who focus on delivering some kind of solution to a problem that interests them. Four major takeaways:
These kids were pragmatic optimists engaged in one of the best learning experiences I could imagine. I grilled a few of them about methodology, approach, rationale and next steps. They more than stood up to the challenge. This was as true for the young lady who used human-centred design to tackle a particular dementia problem as it was for another young student simulating quantum computing algorithms. More than half of the entrants were female. (Another example: Jennifer, a chemist developing nanostructures to improve delivery of CBD-based remedies, won a major prize at the event.)
They tackled real problems. There was no augmented reality marketing nonsense or one-tap dating apps. Instead, renewable low-cost solar roofs that tackle the problem of domestic heat waste; graphene foams to eliminate cadmium from drinking water; wearables to help manage risks around dementia patients and on-demand 3-D printed dressings to minimise the risks of secondary affections with exudating wounds.
They prove that distributing knowledge, theory and practical examples, work. One scientist, age 17, applied a generative adversarial network (a type of neural net which appeared in academia less than five years ago) to her project which, in turn, was one of the first things she had coded. Mind blown. Five years from the research lab to functional school projects. This was super-charged multi-disciplinary, collaborative learning, enabled by that net.
A working infrastructure is essential. The contestants had highly engaged teachers supporting them and benefitted from accessible mentors. The informational technologies were only one part of the mix, the human dimension truly foundational. Education as it should be.
And this is the stand of the chap who went on to win the overall prize. He had an impressive project on quantum computing. I hung around for ten minutes waiting to talk to him, but he had disappeared.
I guess that is the nature of quantum systems: observation always mucks up their state!
Check out the links above and give āem all a retweet because the kids deserve it.
Have a great week!
Azeem š
P.S. Please show your love for Exponential View by tweeting this or forwarding this email to your friends and colleagues.
Oh, and remember to scroll down for updates from your fellow readers.
What you are up to
Dan Gillmor urges newsrooms: āStop being loudspeakers to liarsā. Dan guest-edited Exponential View in 2017, and that issue focusing on the future of journalism is just as relevant today as it was almost two years ago.
Jack Kelly is launching a non-profit to help tackle climate change.
Claudia Chwalisz and OECD calling on you to share innovative practices in open government you're involved with.
Rachel Coldicutt wants you to join her and doteveryone at the Responsible Tech conference on January 31st in London.
Nick Disabato published a book about proving your worth as a designer.
Turi Munthe launched Parli in an effort to map the world's opinions.
Liam Black's open letter to his mentees.
Matt Locke on the need for a public media stack. (Very nice idea.)
Phil Fersht predicts for 2019: Brexit will be dead in a few weeks.